diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'src/contrib/SDL-3.2.20/test/utf8.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | src/contrib/SDL-3.2.20/test/utf8.txt | 287 |
1 files changed, 287 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/contrib/SDL-3.2.20/test/utf8.txt b/src/contrib/SDL-3.2.20/test/utf8.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..aab22f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/contrib/SDL-3.2.20/test/utf8.txt | |||
@@ -0,0 +1,287 @@ | |||
1 | UTF-8 decoder capability and stress test | ||
2 | ---------------------------------------- | ||
3 | |||
4 | Markus Kuhn <http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/> - 2003-02-19 | ||
5 | |||
6 | This test file can help you examine, how your UTF-8 decoder handles | ||
7 | various types of correct, malformed, or otherwise interesting UTF-8 | ||
8 | sequences. This file is not meant to be a conformance test. It does | ||
9 | not prescribes any particular outcome and therefore there is no way to | ||
10 | "pass" or "fail" this test file, even though the texts suggests a | ||
11 | preferable decoder behaviour at some places. The aim is instead to | ||
12 | help you think about and test the behaviour of your UTF-8 on a | ||
13 | systematic collection of unusual inputs. Experience so far suggests | ||
14 | that most first-time authors of UTF-8 decoders find at least one | ||
15 | serious problem in their decoder by using this file. | ||
16 | |||
17 | The test lines below cover boundary conditions, malformed UTF-8 | ||
18 | sequences as well as correctly encoded UTF-8 sequences of Unicode code | ||
19 | points that should never occur in a correct UTF-8 file. | ||
20 | |||
21 | According to ISO 10646-1:2000, sections D.7 and 2.3c, a device | ||
22 | receiving UTF-8 shall interpret a "malformed sequence in the same way | ||
23 | that it interprets a character that is outside the adopted subset" and | ||
24 | "characters that are not within the adopted subset shall be indicated | ||
25 | to the user" by a receiving device. A quite commonly used approach in | ||
26 | UTF-8 decoders is to replace any malformed UTF-8 sequence by a | ||
27 | replacement character (U+FFFD), which looks a bit like an inverted | ||
28 | question mark, or a similar symbol. It might be a good idea to | ||
29 | visually distinguish a malformed UTF-8 sequence from a correctly | ||
30 | encoded Unicode character that is just not available in the current | ||
31 | font but otherwise fully legal, even though ISO 10646-1 doesn't | ||
32 | mandate this. In any case, just ignoring malformed sequences or | ||
33 | unavailable characters does not conform to ISO 10646, will make | ||
34 | debugging more difficult, and can lead to user confusion. | ||
35 | |||
36 | Please check, whether a malformed UTF-8 sequence is (1) represented at | ||
37 | all, (2) represented by exactly one single replacement character (or | ||
38 | equivalent signal), and (3) the following quotation mark after an | ||
39 | illegal UTF-8 sequence is correctly displayed, i.e. proper | ||
40 | resynchronization takes place immageately after any malformed | ||
41 | sequence. This file says "THE END" in the last line, so if you don't | ||
42 | see that, your decoder crashed somehow before, which should always be | ||
43 | cause for concern. | ||
44 | |||
45 | All lines in this file are exactly 79 characters long (plus the line | ||
46 | feed). In addition, all lines end with "|", except for the two test | ||
47 | lines 2.1.1 and 2.2.1, which contain non-printable ASCII controls | ||
48 | U+0000 and U+007F. If you display this file with a fixed-width font, | ||
49 | these "|" characters should all line up in column 79 (right margin). | ||
50 | This allows you to test quickly, whether your UTF-8 decoder finds the | ||
51 | correct number of characters in every line, that is whether each | ||
52 | malformed sequences is replaced by a single replacement character. | ||
53 | |||
54 | Note that as an alternative to the notion of malformed sequence used | ||
55 | here, it is also a perfectly acceptable (and in some situations even | ||
56 | preferable) solution to represent each individual byte of a malformed | ||
57 | sequence by a replacement character. If you follow this strategy in | ||
58 | your decoder, then please ignore the "|" column. | ||
59 | |||
60 | |||
61 | Here come the tests: | | ||
62 | | | ||
63 | 1 Some correct UTF-8 text | | ||
64 | | | ||
65 | (The codepoints for this test are: | | ||
66 | U+03BA U+1F79 U+03C3 U+03BC U+03B5 --ryan.) | | ||
67 | | | ||
68 | You should see the Greek word 'kosme': "κόσμε" | | ||
69 | | | ||
70 | | | ||
71 | 2 Boundary condition test cases | | ||
72 | | | ||
73 | 2.1 First possible sequence of a certain length | | ||
74 | | | ||
75 | (byte zero skipped...there's a null added at the end of the test. --ryan.) | | ||
76 | | | ||
77 | 2.1.2 2 bytes (U-00000080): "" | | ||
78 | 2.1.3 3 bytes (U-00000800): "ࠀ" | | ||
79 | 2.1.4 4 bytes (U-00010000): "𐀀" | | ||
80 | | | ||
81 | (5 and 6 byte sequences were made illegal in rfc3629. --ryan.) | | ||
82 | 2.1.5 5 bytes (U-00200000): "" | | ||
83 | 2.1.6 6 bytes (U-04000000): "" | | ||
84 | | | ||
85 | 2.2 Last possible sequence of a certain length | | ||
86 | | | ||
87 | 2.2.1 1 byte (U-0000007F): "" | | ||
88 | 2.2.2 2 bytes (U-000007FF): "߿" | | ||
89 | | | ||
90 | (Section 5.3.2 below calls this illegal. --ryan.) | | ||
91 | 2.2.3 3 bytes (U-0000FFFF): "" | | ||
92 | | | ||
93 | (5 and 6 bytes sequences, and 4 bytes sequences > 0x10FFFF were made illegal | | ||
94 | in rfc3629, so these next three should be replaced with a invalid | | ||
95 | character codepoint. --ryan.) | | ||
96 | 2.2.4 4 bytes (U-001FFFFF): "" | | ||
97 | 2.2.5 5 bytes (U-03FFFFFF): "" | | ||
98 | 2.2.6 6 bytes (U-7FFFFFFF): "" | | ||
99 | | | ||
100 | 2.3 Other boundary conditions | | ||
101 | | | ||
102 | 2.3.1 U-0000D7FF = ed 9f bf = "" | | ||
103 | 2.3.2 U-0000E000 = ee 80 80 = "" | | ||
104 | 2.3.3 U-0000FFFD = ef bf bd = "�" | | ||
105 | 2.3.4 U-0010FFFF = f4 8f bf bf = "" | | ||
106 | | | ||
107 | (This one is bogus in rfc3629. --ryan.) | | ||
108 | 2.3.5 U-00110000 = f4 90 80 80 = "" | | ||
109 | | | ||
110 | 3 Malformed sequences | | ||
111 | | | ||
112 | 3.1 Unexpected continuation bytes | | ||
113 | | | ||
114 | Each unexpected continuation byte should be separately signalled as a | | ||
115 | malformed sequence of its own. | | ||
116 | | | ||
117 | 3.1.1 First continuation byte 0x80: "" | | ||
118 | 3.1.2 Last continuation byte 0xbf: "" | | ||
119 | | | ||
120 | 3.1.3 2 continuation bytes: "" | | ||
121 | 3.1.4 3 continuation bytes: "" | | ||
122 | 3.1.5 4 continuation bytes: "" | | ||
123 | 3.1.6 5 continuation bytes: "" | | ||
124 | 3.1.7 6 continuation bytes: "" | | ||
125 | 3.1.8 7 continuation bytes: "" | | ||
126 | | | ||
127 | 3.1.9 Sequence of all 64 possible continuation bytes (0x80-0xbf): | | ||
128 | | | ||
129 | " | | ||
130 | | | ||
131 | | | ||
132 | " | | ||
133 | | | ||
134 | 3.2 Lonely start characters | | ||
135 | | | ||
136 | 3.2.1 All 32 first bytes of 2-byte sequences (0xc0-0xdf), | | ||
137 | each followed by a space character: | | ||
138 | | | ||
139 | " | | ||
140 | " | | ||
141 | | | ||
142 | 3.2.2 All 16 first bytes of 3-byte sequences (0xe0-0xef), | | ||
143 | each followed by a space character: | | ||
144 | | | ||
145 | " " | | ||
146 | | | ||
147 | 3.2.3 All 8 first bytes of 4-byte sequences (0xf0-0xf7), | | ||
148 | each followed by a space character: | | ||
149 | | | ||
150 | " " | | ||
151 | | | ||
152 | 3.2.4 All 4 first bytes of 5-byte sequences (0xf8-0xfb), | | ||
153 | each followed by a space character: | | ||
154 | | | ||
155 | " " | | ||
156 | | | ||
157 | 3.2.5 All 2 first bytes of 6-byte sequences (0xfc-0xfd), | | ||
158 | each followed by a space character: | | ||
159 | | | ||
160 | " " | | ||
161 | | | ||
162 | 3.3 Sequences with last continuation byte missing | | ||
163 | | | ||
164 | All bytes of an incomplete sequence should be signalled as a single | | ||
165 | malformed sequence, i.e., you should see only a single replacement | | ||
166 | character in each of the next 10 tests. (Characters as in section 2) | | ||
167 | | | ||
168 | 3.3.1 2-byte sequence with last byte missing (U+0000): "" | | ||
169 | 3.3.2 3-byte sequence with last byte missing (U+0000): "" | | ||
170 | 3.3.3 4-byte sequence with last byte missing (U+0000): "" | | ||
171 | 3.3.4 5-byte sequence with last byte missing (U+0000): "" | | ||
172 | 3.3.5 6-byte sequence with last byte missing (U+0000): "" | | ||
173 | 3.3.6 2-byte sequence with last byte missing (U-000007FF): "" | | ||
174 | 3.3.7 3-byte sequence with last byte missing (U-0000FFFF): "" | | ||
175 | 3.3.8 4-byte sequence with last byte missing (U-001FFFFF): "" | | ||
176 | 3.3.9 5-byte sequence with last byte missing (U-03FFFFFF): "" | | ||
177 | 3.3.10 6-byte sequence with last byte missing (U-7FFFFFFF): "" | | ||
178 | | | ||
179 | 3.4 Concatenation of incomplete sequences | | ||
180 | | | ||
181 | All the 10 sequences of 3.3 concatenated, you should see 10 malformed | | ||
182 | sequences being signalled: | | ||
183 | | | ||
184 | "" | | ||
185 | | | ||
186 | 3.5 Impossible bytes | | ||
187 | | | ||
188 | The following two bytes cannot appear in a correct UTF-8 string | | ||
189 | | | ||
190 | 3.5.1 fe = "" | | ||
191 | 3.5.2 ff = "" | | ||
192 | 3.5.3 fe fe ff ff = "" | | ||
193 | | | ||
194 | 4 Overlong sequences | | ||
195 | | | ||
196 | The following sequences are not malformed according to the letter of | | ||
197 | the Unicode 2.0 standard. However, they are longer then necessary and | | ||
198 | a correct UTF-8 encoder is not allowed to produce them. A "safe UTF-8 | | ||
199 | decoder" should reject them just like malformed sequences for two | | ||
200 | reasons: (1) It helps to debug applications if overlong sequences are | | ||
201 | not treated as valid representations of characters, because this helps | | ||
202 | to spot problems more quickly. (2) Overlong sequences provide | | ||
203 | alternative representations of characters, that could maliciously be | | ||
204 | used to bypass filters that check only for ASCII characters. For | | ||
205 | instance, a 2-byte encoded line feed (LF) would not be caught by a | | ||
206 | line counter that counts only 0x0a bytes, but it would still be | | ||
207 | processed as a line feed by an unsafe UTF-8 decoder later in the | | ||
208 | pipeline. From a security point of view, ASCII compatibility of UTF-8 | | ||
209 | sequences means also, that ASCII characters are *only* allowed to be | | ||
210 | represented by ASCII bytes in the range 0x00-0x7f. To ensure this | | ||
211 | aspect of ASCII compatibility, use only "safe UTF-8 decoders" that | | ||
212 | reject overlong UTF-8 sequences for which a shorter encoding exists. | | ||
213 | | | ||
214 | 4.1 Examples of an overlong ASCII character | | ||
215 | | | ||
216 | With a safe UTF-8 decoder, all of the following five overlong | | ||
217 | representations of the ASCII character slash ("/") should be rejected | | ||
218 | like a malformed UTF-8 sequence, for instance by substituting it with | | ||
219 | a replacement character. If you see a slash below, you do not have a | | ||
220 | safe UTF-8 decoder! | | ||
221 | | | ||
222 | 4.1.1 U+002F = c0 af = "" | | ||
223 | 4.1.2 U+002F = e0 80 af = "" | | ||
224 | 4.1.3 U+002F = f0 80 80 af = "" | | ||
225 | 4.1.4 U+002F = f8 80 80 80 af = "" | | ||
226 | 4.1.5 U+002F = fc 80 80 80 80 af = "" | | ||
227 | | | ||
228 | 4.2 Maximum overlong sequences | | ||
229 | | | ||
230 | Below you see the highest Unicode value that is still resulting in an | | ||
231 | overlong sequence if represented with the given number of bytes. This | | ||
232 | is a boundary test for safe UTF-8 decoders. All five characters should | | ||
233 | be rejected like malformed UTF-8 sequences. | | ||
234 | | | ||
235 | 4.2.1 U-0000007F = c1 bf = "" | | ||
236 | 4.2.2 U-000007FF = e0 9f bf = "" | | ||
237 | 4.2.3 U-0000FFFF = f0 8f bf bf = "" | | ||
238 | 4.2.4 U-001FFFFF = f8 87 bf bf bf = "" | | ||
239 | 4.2.5 U-03FFFFFF = fc 83 bf bf bf bf = "" | | ||
240 | | | ||
241 | 4.3 Overlong representation of the NUL character | | ||
242 | | | ||
243 | The following five sequences should also be rejected like malformed | | ||
244 | UTF-8 sequences and should not be treated like the ASCII NUL | | ||
245 | character. | | ||
246 | | | ||
247 | 4.3.1 U+0000 = c0 80 = "" | | ||
248 | 4.3.2 U+0000 = e0 80 80 = "" | | ||
249 | 4.3.3 U+0000 = f0 80 80 80 = "" | | ||
250 | 4.3.4 U+0000 = f8 80 80 80 80 = "" | | ||
251 | 4.3.5 U+0000 = fc 80 80 80 80 80 = "" | | ||
252 | | | ||
253 | 5 Illegal code positions | | ||
254 | | | ||
255 | The following UTF-8 sequences should be rejected like malformed | | ||
256 | sequences, because they never represent valid ISO 10646 characters and | | ||
257 | a UTF-8 decoder that accepts them might introduce security problems | | ||
258 | comparable to overlong UTF-8 sequences. | | ||
259 | | | ||
260 | 5.1 Single UTF-16 surrogates | | ||
261 | | | ||
262 | 5.1.1 U+D800 = ed a0 80 = "" | | ||
263 | 5.1.2 U+DB7F = ed ad bf = "" | | ||
264 | 5.1.3 U+DB80 = ed ae 80 = "" | | ||
265 | 5.1.4 U+DBFF = ed af bf = "" | | ||
266 | 5.1.5 U+DC00 = ed b0 80 = "" | | ||
267 | 5.1.6 U+DF80 = ed be 80 = "" | | ||
268 | 5.1.7 U+DFFF = ed bf bf = "" | | ||
269 | | | ||
270 | 5.2 Paired UTF-16 surrogates | | ||
271 | | | ||
272 | 5.2.1 U+D800 U+DC00 = ed a0 80 ed b0 80 = "" | | ||
273 | 5.2.2 U+D800 U+DFFF = ed a0 80 ed bf bf = "" | | ||
274 | 5.2.3 U+DB7F U+DC00 = ed ad bf ed b0 80 = "" | | ||
275 | 5.2.4 U+DB7F U+DFFF = ed ad bf ed bf bf = "" | | ||
276 | 5.2.5 U+DB80 U+DC00 = ed ae 80 ed b0 80 = "" | | ||
277 | 5.2.6 U+DB80 U+DFFF = ed ae 80 ed bf bf = "" | | ||
278 | 5.2.7 U+DBFF U+DC00 = ed af bf ed b0 80 = "" | | ||
279 | 5.2.8 U+DBFF U+DFFF = ed af bf ed bf bf = "" | | ||
280 | | | ||
281 | 5.3 Other illegal code positions | | ||
282 | | | ||
283 | 5.3.1 U+FFFE = ef bf be = "" | | ||
284 | 5.3.2 U+FFFF = ef bf bf = "" | | ||
285 | | | ||
286 | THE END | | ||
287 | |||